
Visit our sponsor.
The standards depend on the type of ISA / component. To be CAT marked the ISA must meet all the rules, not just some of them.
Charges
In essence no charges allowed except for special services like extra or duplicate statements, or replacing lost cash cards.
Access
Within 7 working days or less, and the minimum transaction cannot be greater than £10.
Terms
Limitations of CAT products compared to non CAT products
The above sounds all very nice, but from a managers point of view this flexibility carries an inherent cost, (to process a withdrawl costs money, even if the client can't be charged for it). CAT standard ISAs will have to make money. In short this means that the CAT ISA rates will probably be lower than non CAT rates.
For example a manager might offer a very good rate on the basis that the investment was for a minimum term, or that only one withdrawal a year would be made, or that any transactions would incur a transaction charge. None of the above could be called CAT standard ISAs, but, because they would be cheaper to run, might offer better interest rates than their CAT version.
Charges
Access
Terms
Limitations of CAT products compared to non CAT products
Self select share and self managed plans will not be CAT. Many attractive funds will not meet the single price rule, and the geographical limits could be a problem.
Plan managers should be able to offer CAT Index Trackers within these limits, but the expenses of running more active funds will probably mean that most non Tracker ISAs will not be CAT standard.
Charges
Access
Terms
Limitations of CAT products compared to non CAT products
The ISA rules do allow managers to offer protection policies but since these would have low to nil surrender value they cannot meet CAT criteria.
If you require the CAT facilities, then yes. But if you don't need them and there are better rate non CAT ISAs whose terms are acceptable to you, then non CAT is fine.
And finally:-
CAT tells you NOTHING ABOUT PERFORMANCE. CAT standards do not look at performance, nor are they even a proxy for it. If CAT products were the worst perfroming ISAs in the world they would keep their CAT standard and shout it from the rooftops.